Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 02:34
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
2 new measles cases confirmed in Colorado - 9News
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why are there so many girls and not enough boys to follow?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Dying Light: The Beast launches August 22 - Gematsu
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Willi Castro homers twice, Royce Lewis ends skid as Twins crush Athletics - Sports Illustrated
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Women like what they hear while men like what they see, it that true?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.